Revision history for WikisAreUgly


Revision [18642]

Last edited on 2018-02-27 07:58:31 by BonnieRobinson
Additions:
====Wikis Get a Make-Over====
I found an open source [[https://wiki.js.org/||wiki app]] that is changing the face of wikis. These developers used Node.js, Git and Markdown to create a modern, more aesthetically pleasing wiki. When looking at their platform, the wiki more closely resembles a typical website with a navigational sidebar menu, more images and graphics and more of your expected web conventions. The app will "automagically" - their word - process all of the content the contributor adds into a more readable format, essentially giving your old-boring wiki content a fabulous new look that your friends are going to love!

Brianna Graner pointed out that the purpose of wikis is not to be "attractive to the eye but to be attractive for the brain." I liked this phrasing because unlike the objective of many web site developers (whose goal is to allow users to navigate their site without having to make a lot of difficult decisions), the wiki is inviting the user to jump in to the intellectual pool and start swimming. Kendra Hacker also pointed out that wikis are used to eliminate the distractions that other platforms contain so as to help the participants stay focused.
The discussion at the top of the page circled around the idea of representation and presentation. This wiki.js app adds a whole new element to this debate because now you have a third party using an algorithm (or something) to determine how your content should be displayed. Many followers of TheWikiWay are faithful to this medium because of the freedom and the non-conformist style. I am curious to know how the pioneers and staunch wiki followers react to something like wiki.js app.
----
I, BonnieRobinson, contributed the section Wikis Get a Make-Over
----
I, KendraHacker , added the last paragraph of information at the bottom of the page (under Brianna's post).
Deletions:
I, KendraHacker , added the last paragraph of information at the bottom of the page (under Brianna's post).


Revision [18613]

Edited on 2018-02-26 18:00:50 by KendraHacker
Additions:
Wikis seem ugly and boring to many users because they're just lines and lines of text that is filled with information and a few pictures here and there. The theme that wikis have are consistent and something that users expect. Users can read information quickly without getting distracted by colorful themes. According to [[http://www.speeli.com/articles/view/Why-is-Wikipedia-so-boring | this article]] wikis are usually associated with homework research, so even though wikis can be seen as ugly, they do get their purpose across by having a simple design that allow users to get their information quickly and effectively.
- KendraHacker
-----
I, KendraHacker , added the last paragraph of information at the bottom of the page (under Brianna's post).


Revision [17668]

Edited on 2017-02-20 19:25:56 by MadelynHaasken
Additions:
Wikis were certainly not made to be pretty or even nice looking (like blogs are). Wikis are instead a way to collaborate on topics and create a bank of information created by different people in order to obtain different points of view and different pieces of knowledge. Wikis have an entirely different purpose than blogs. They are set up to be formatted enough so people can edit and read the information. They are a team-effort, blogs are more of a personal journal. Yes, there are different ways to format a wiki slightly (as explained in the above comment), however, wikis aren't meant to look as aesthetic as blogs.
~~~~MadelynHaasken


Revision [17614]

Edited on 2017-02-17 10:49:01 by BriannaGraner
Additions:
Being adverse to wikis because they are ugly is a shame. Wikis are a convenient and efficient way to work, either solo or collaboratively. The purpose if a wiki is not to capture attention in the same way as any old website. Generally, websites are designed to appeal to the viewer and to ensure the viewer has a pleasant viewing experience. The difference here is that wikis are a tool for information, not //just //a pretty face. The goal of a wiki is not be attractive to the eyes but to be attractive for the brain. Wikis are generally organized for information, not for casual viewing. Wikis, being a collaborative work environment are best set up for (as stated by the others above) ease of editing.
~~~~BriannaGraner


Revision [16944]

Edited on 2016-03-21 08:10:55 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
===== Wikis Are Ugly =====


Revision [16612]

Edited on 2016-02-22 22:41:12 by JanePatch
Additions:
Kaitlyn's question above,"Is a Blog more of a representation of ourselves in a current time, situation, or experience and is a Wiki more of a presentation of information and ideas that can be constantly changed or edited?" is a great one. Blogs are definitely more of a representation of ourselves. The readers are engaged by the pleasing layout of a blog, chosen by the bloggers, as much as they are engaged by the content of the blog. The bloggers are making a specific choice about what information to include on their blog so they are giving a current representation of themselves involving the chosen topic. Comments can be made by readers, involving them on a secondary level. Wikis on the other hand allow readers to become involved on a primary level because wikis are used for a different purpose than blogs. Wikis are intended to be used more as a drop-box for information. Readers are allowed, in fact encouraged, to add their two cents worth to the topic to make it better for future readers. Wikis are developed to keep in time with our ever-changing, fast-paced world of immediate gratification. Want to know something, google WikipediA. It's an almost guarantee that what you are looking for is there, updated with the most current information available. Do you care that the format is ugly? Not really, because the most important factor is that you get the information you want, immediately!, without having to search around a bunch of images and fancy fonts that no one can read anyway.
While it is true that wikis are designed for ease of editing rather than aesthetics, there are ways to make a page "pretty" if you must. It just takes some time to learn the formatting. A good starting point for learning more is at FormattingRules. I was able to make my page more pleasing by using a few of these simple techniques. Including some aesthetic formatting into a page you create or edit won't deter from the ease of editing by others in the future because if they have information to add to your page, they can simply go in, follow the formatting code you have established to add their bits and pieces and store it. Just don't go so crazy with the formatting that it makes it nearly impossible to edit if you are encouraging others to add to your information.
~~~~JanePatch


Revision [16568]

Edited on 2016-02-22 15:54:47 by MelissaMcNeill
Additions:
Wikis are viewed as "ugly" because of the way it looks. [[http://wikisx2.wikispaces.com/Blogs+vs+Wikis Wikis]] are created for multiple users at a time. It is made to used easily and edited much easier. Wikis are also about the facts or information to be shared. It is not about the appearance of the text but the text itself. Blogs are different in that way because it is usually by an individual and the way to for people to get interested in a blog is if it appeals to our eyes. People use wikis to share information with the community. Wikis are about the information, not the looks.
~~~~MelissaMcNeill


Revision [16452]

Edited on 2016-02-21 18:07:28 by HannahCook
Additions:
Wiki's are more professional looking than blogs which is why they can be considered boring. They are a great way to share information in a more organized fashion because wiki's are very simple and easy to use. A blog is a bit more personal because only the writer can edit it, but in a wiki everyone can edit which can be dangerous. Most people will only contribute positives or recent, relevant, information about the subject but there are also people, known formally as "Trolls," who will mess with a post because it's funny.
~~~~HannahCook


Revision [16406]

The oldest known version of this page was created on 2016-02-21 12:11:58 by KaitlynStewart
Valid XHTML :: Valid CSS: :: Powered by WikkaWiki