Revision history for MorgansNotesOnMessagesChap4


Revision [20747]

Last edited on 2015-02-11 10:36:13 by MorganAdmin

No Differences

Revision [18843]

Edited on 2014-09-28 07:39:52 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
- [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBmCJEehYtU | Cover of Royals]] by Puddles Pity Party, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlcIKh6sBtc originally by Lorde]]. Non-participation. Puddles's entire act seems to be based on non-participation but in comparing the two versions of the song and the videos, what emerges is the clownishness of the original. By not participating in the video scene, by making fun of it from the outside, the cover points up that the original is stylistically precious.
Deletions:
- [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBmCJEehYtU | Cover of Royals]] by Puddles Pity Party, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlcIKh6sBtc originally by Lorde]]. I haven't looked closely enough at the specifics of the text and the specifics of the context to place this yet. The relation we're looking at is that between this text and the context it addressed at the time, not conformity or non-conformity to genre.


Revision [18813]

Edited on 2014-09-23 09:44:37 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
The StrunkNWhite of web design is [[http://webstyleguide.com | The Web Style Guide]].


Revision [18811]

Edited on 2014-09-23 09:42:04 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
BSU University web site home page < conformity. Recall that we saw two registers at work on the MSU Mankato Tech Writing page: institutional (dominantly in the deliberative text in taxons and links) , and academic in the center panel. Compare this to [[http://www.washcoll.edu | Washington College]]. We might be seeing a contextual reconstruction towards marketing register and epideictic rather than deliberative prose. It might be interesting to see where in the site this visual and textual marketing register appears, and where the register shifts.
[[http://www.deviantart.com/ | DeviantArt home page]] < conformity. I had expected non-conformity.
Deletions:
BSU University web site home page < conformity. Recall that we saw two registers at work on the MSU Mankato Tech Writing page: institutional (dominantly in the deliberative text in taxons and links) , and academic in the center panel. Compare this to [[http://www.washcoll.edu | Washington College]]. We might be seeing a contextual reconstruction towards marketing register and epideictic rather than deliberative prose. It might be interesting to see where in the site this visual and textual marketing register appears, and where the register shifts.
[[http://www.deviantart.com/ | DeviantArt home page]] < conformity. I had expected non-conformity.


Revision [18810]

Edited on 2014-09-23 09:40:34 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
- an unclear or ill-defined visual hierarchy
- sound or video that automatically runs when the page is opened
Deletions:
- use a clear visual hierarchy:


Revision [18809]

Edited on 2014-09-23 09:38:32 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
The text-context relationship lets us re-consider some common rhetorical moves in digital spheres. In print, rebuses, shorthand, acronyms (FTW, WTF) and light or missing punctuation are typically seen as violations of print- and paper-based one-to many communication (although they often do occur in personal letters, one to one). When considered within the rhetorical context of a particular Twitter stream, however, these affordances are conforming, while their non-use will appear as non-participation.
Deletions:
The text-context relationship lets us re-consider some common rhetorical moves in digital spheres. Rebuses, shorthand, acronyms (FTW, WTF) and light or missing punctuation in IM and Twitter are typically seen as violations of print- and paper-based one-to many communication (although they often do occur in personal letters, one to one). When considered within the rhetorical context of Twitter, however, these affordances are conforming, while the non-use can appear as non-participation.


Revision [18808]

Edited on 2014-09-23 09:33:43 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
==== Text-Context Relations in Digital Media and Contexts ====
Deletions:
==== Text-Context Relations in Digital Media ====


Revision [18807]

Edited on 2014-09-23 09:32:19 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
The text-context relationship lets us re-consider some common rhetorical moves in digital spheres. Rebuses, shorthand, acronyms (FTW, WTF) and light or missing punctuation in IM and Twitter are typically seen as violations of print- and paper-based one-to many communication (although they often do occur in personal letters, one to one). When considered within the rhetorical context of Twitter, however, these affordances are conforming, while the non-use can appear as non-participation.
Text and context differences on Twitter. Two sphericules w/ their own text-context conventions
- [[https://twitter.com/search?q=%23justinbieber&src=tyah Twitter Bieber context]]
- [[https://twitter.com/search?q=%23digitalhumanities&src=tyah Twitter DH context]]
Deletions:
The text-context relationship lets us re-consider some common rhetorical moves in digital spheres. Rebuses, shorthand, acronyms (FTW, WTF) and light or missing punctuation in IM and Twitter are typically seen as violations of print- and paper-based one-to many communication (although they often do occur in personal letters, one to one). When considered within the rhetorical context of Twitter, however, these affordances are conforming, while the non-use might appear as non-participation.


Revision [18798]

Edited on 2014-09-23 07:13:04 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
The function of taking notes and writing paragraphs of descriptions from those notes.
Take notes las you describe, whether in bullet points, diagrams, on paper or on the wiki ... **Then from those notes**, compose a few paragraphs that describe the artifact, presenting the essential patterns that characterize it.
Consider how the site is used and where it will be used. Might need to do some research into the specific circumstances of the site. Consider how it, or portions of it, might be responding to specific circumstances, such as special events or seasonal events ...
The tricky part here is developing a sense of //similar// and the variations. For instance, not all university websites are //similar//. They vary, and they probably vary by the rhetors's sense of specific circumstances and intended audience, which, in turn, is driven by other, local circumstances. A specific artifact in one genre may be more similar to artifacts in another genre:
Not just demographics but psychographic information: the values and attitudes and ways of thinking and seeing that the artifact entails. The artifact presents the values of the implied audience.
This might seem unnecessary, but it has become so easy to do (Just Google It) that** it's obligatory** to find something out about the implied rhetor and / or the actual author, the broader context in which the artifact is operating, the historical and cultural context. It saves a lot of time and frustration to read up on the background rather than guessing.
S&P describe the problem.
S&P use these concepts as "analytical tools" be applying them to rhetorical artifacts. To get a handle on how text and context interact, try this: "The seemingly innocuous context of missing a few days of work is not an uncommon ”exigence” or situation needing an explanation."
- Is the subordinate’s response an attempt to re-create the situation? (”I know missing is not good for the group. However, I had a larger concern on my mind because I was counseling my little brother to get him away from a cult. His life was literally at stake and I had tolconsider the relative importance of the demands upon me =- I chose to save my brother’s life.") (66)
==== Text-Context Relations in Digital Media ====
The text-context relationship lets us re-consider some common rhetorical moves in digital spheres. Rebuses, shorthand, acronyms (FTW, WTF) and light or missing punctuation in IM and Twitter are typically seen as violations of print- and paper-based one-to many communication (although they often do occur in personal letters, one to one). When considered within the rhetorical context of Twitter, however, these affordances are conforming, while the non-use might appear as non-participation.
=== Some more examples ===
=== text-c0ntext interaction in a couple of music videos ===
Deletions:
The function of taking notes and revising notes.
Take notes las you describe, whether in bullet points, diagrams, paper, ... Then from those notes, compose a few paragraphs that describe the artifact, ending in a characterization.
Not just the demographics but psychographic information.
This might seem unnecessary, but it has become so easy to do (Just Google It) that it's obligatory to find something out about the implied rhetor and / or the actual author, the broader context in which the artifact is operating, the historical and cultural context. It saves a lot of time and frustration to read up on the background rather than guessing.
Facing the expected from a descriptive stance.
S&P use these concepts as "analytical tools" be applying them to rhetorical artifacts. To get a handle on how text and context interact, try this:
- Is the subordinate’s response an attempt to re-create the situation? (”I know missing is not good for the group. However, I had a larger concern on my mind because I was counseling my little brother to get him away from a cult. His life was literally at stake and I had tolconsider the relative importance of the demands upon me =- I chose to save my brother’s life.")
The seemingly innocuous context of missing a few days of work is not an uncommon ”exigence” or situation needing an explanation. (66)
==== Some other examples ====
==== Text-Context Relations in Other Digital Media ====
The text-context relationship let us re-consider some common rhetorical moves in digital spheres. Rebuses, shorthand, acronyms (FTW, WTF) and light or missing punctuation in IM and Twitter are typically seen as violations of print- and paper-based one-to many communication (although they often do occur in personal letters, one to one). When considered within the rhetorical context of Twitter, however, these affordances are conforming, while the non-use might appear as non-participation.
We can also see text-c0ntext interaction in a couple of music videos.


Revision [18789]

Edited on 2014-09-23 06:36:23 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
=== from chap 3 ===
Description, as a process, amounts to characterizing the message under analysis. That is, as you look long and hard at a message, you want to be able to grasp the message in such a way that you can //present ... the essential characteristics and patterns within the message.// ... description doesn’t attempt to retell the other person by getting stuck in recounting superficial details; rather, it points out what makes [the artifact] ... distinctive - it recounts the features that make Karen unique and important. (28)
Your description process may begin with you talking through all the details of the message, but each time you examine the message, your description will become less a retelling and more a characterization of essential elements - those elements or dimensions of the message that make it worth examining. Remember that at this point description is a way of thinking about a message; you are working on discovering an insight about a message. (29)
So, take notes first, whether in bullet points, diagrams, paper, ... Then from those notes, compose a few paragraphs that describe the artifact, ending in a characterization.
Description, as one kind of critical thinking, helps discipline your approach to any message. Description helps you slow down and consciously think about what you observe in the message, which helps you move beyond your first “glandular” reaction. (47) - and is a way of getting to the specifics of the text you're focusing on.
Your description process may begin with you talking through all the details of the message, but each time you examine the message, your description will become less a retelling and more a characterization of essential elements - those elements or dimensions of the message that make it worth examining. Remember that at this point description is a way of thinking about a message; you are working on discovering an insight about a message. (29)
Take notes las you describe, whether in bullet points, diagrams, paper, ... Then from those notes, compose a few paragraphs that describe the artifact, ending in a characterization.
== Describe Specific Circumstances==
S&P use these concepts as "analytical tools" be applying them to rhetorical artifacts. To get a handle on how text and context interact, try this:
think of yourself as a manager in an office or factory where you ask one of your subordinates why he missed the last three days of work. That person’s behavior exists in some context, and, //in order to make sense of the story you are given//, you may ask:
- ls this story an effort to conform to or affirm the context? (”I understand that my absences cause problems for everyone on the project. I’m sorry about the trouble and will try not to miss anymore")
- ls the story an effort to "not participate” in or avoid attending to the situation? (“I didn't realize missing was a problem. Say, did you see the Oscars the other night ... ?”)
- Is the story designed to desecrate the context? (“Where I am and where I go is my business. You have no right bugging me about where I've been-you don’t own mel”)
- Is the subordinate’s response an attempt to re-create the situation? (”I know missing is not good for the group. However, I had a larger concern on my mind because I was counseling my little brother to get him away from a cult. His life was literally at stake and I had tolconsider the relative importance of the demands upon me =- I chose to save my brother’s life.")
The seemingly innocuous context of missing a few days of work is not an uncommon ”exigence” or situation needing an explanation. (66)
==== Some other examples ====
[[http://www.deviantart.com/ | DeviantArt home page]] < conformity. I had expected non-conformity.
[[http://www.middlebury.edu/#story485577 |Middlebury College]]. < Looks initially like non-participation in the design rhetoric on the home page. But look at the rhetor - the designers of the site (whitewhale. net) - which is part of the context, suggest an attempt to re-create / re-define the situation of the university home page.
Deletions:
Description, as one kind of critical thinking, helps discipline your approach to any message. Description helps you slow down and consciously think about what you observe in the message, which helps you move beyond your first “glandular” reaction. (47) - and is a way of getting to the specifics of the text you're looking at.
== Describe Specific Circumstances== (kairos)
S&P suggest that "these ideas useful as analytical tools."
Try using the preceding ideas informally and see how they work in everyday conversation. For example, think of yourself as a manager in an office or factory where you ask one of your subordinates why he missed the last three days of work. That person’s behavior exists in some context, and, in order to make sense of the story you are given, you may ask: ls this story an effort to conform to or affirm the context? (”I understand that my absences cause problems for everyone on the project. I’m sorry about the trouble and will try not to miss anymore") ls the story an effort to "not participate” in or avoid attending to the situation? (“I didn't realize missing was a problem. Say, did you see the Oscars the other night ... ?”) Is the story designed to desecrate the context? (“Where I am and where I go is my business. You have no right bugging me about where I've been-you don’t own mel”) Is the subordinate’s response an attempt to re- create the situation? (”I know missing is not good for the group. However, I had a larger concern on my mind because I was counseling my little brother to get him away from a cult. His life was literally at stake and I had tolconsider the relative importance of the demands upon me =- I chose to save my brother’s life.") The seemingly innocuous context of missing a few days of work is not an uncommon ”exigence” or situation needing an explanation. (66)
==== Some examples ====
in draft
[[http://www.deviantart.com/ | DeviantArt home page]] < conformity
[[http://www.middlebury.edu/#story485577 |Middlebury College]]. < non-participation in the design rhetoric on the home page.


Revision [18788]

Edited on 2014-09-23 06:19:18 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
Description, as one kind of critical thinking, helps discipline your approach to any message. Description helps you slow down and consciously think about what you observe in the message, which helps you move beyond your first “glandular” reaction. (47) - and is a way of getting to the specifics of the text you're looking at.
By describing messages,//finding the essential characteristics that make messages noteworthy//, we become mindful and careful to see them in ways that we don't normally see them in daily life. (48)


Revision [18619]

Edited on 2014-09-20 07:48:13 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
BSU University web site home page < conformity. Recall that we saw two registers at work on the MSU Mankato Tech Writing page: institutional (dominantly in the deliberative text in taxons and links) , and academic in the center panel. Compare this to [[http://www.washcoll.edu | Washington College]]. We might be seeing a contextual reconstruction towards marketing register and epideictic rather than deliberative prose. It might be interesting to see where in the site this visual and textual marketing register appears, and where the register shifts.
Deletions:
BSU University web site home page < conformity. Recall that we saw two registers at work on the MSU Mankato Tech Writing page: institutional (dominantly in the deliberative text in taxons and links) , and academic in the center panel. Compare this to [[http://www.washcoll.edu | Washington College]]. We might be seeing a contextual reconstruction towards marketing register and epideictic rather than deliberative prose. It might be interesting to see how deep into the site thi visual and textual marketing register goes.


Revision [18618]

Edited on 2014-09-20 07:42:58 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
BSU University web site home page < conformity. Recall that we saw two registers at work on the MSU Mankato Tech Writing page: institutional (dominantly in the deliberative text in taxons and links) , and academic in the center panel. Compare this to [[http://www.washcoll.edu | Washington College]]. We might be seeing a contextual reconstruction towards marketing register and epideictic rather than deliberative prose. It might be interesting to see how deep into the site thi visual and textual marketing register goes.
[[http://www.middlebury.edu/#story485577 |Middlebury College]]. < non-participation in the design rhetoric on the home page.
Deletions:
BSU University web site home page < conformity
[[http://www.middlebury.edu/#story485577 |Middlebury College]]. < non-participation in the design rhetoric on the home page. Ditto http://www.washcoll.edu. Likely seeing a contextual reconstruction towards marketing language.


Revision [18617]

Edited on 2014-09-20 07:36:04 by CodyMadison1
Additions:
[[http://www.middlebury.edu/#story485577 |Middlebury College]]. < non-participation in the design rhetoric on the home page. Ditto http://www.washcoll.edu. Likely seeing a contextual reconstruction towards marketing language.
Deletions:
[[http://www.middlebury.edu/#story485577 |Middlebury College]]. < non-participation in the design rhetoric on the home page. The design site http://www.whitewhale.net itself might be an interesting example of non-participation or textual reconstruction.


Revision [18613]

Edited on 2014-09-20 05:51:10 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
[[http://www.middlebury.edu/#story485577 |Middlebury College]]. < non-participation in the design rhetoric on the home page. The design site http://www.whitewhale.net itself might be an interesting example of non-participation or textual reconstruction.
Deletions:
[[http://www.middlebury.edu/#story485577 |Middlebury College]]. < non-participation in the design rhetoric on the home page. http://www.whitewhale.net


Revision [18612]

Edited on 2014-09-20 05:46:28 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
[[http://www.middlebury.edu/#story485577 |Middlebury College]]. < non-participation in the design rhetoric on the home page. http://www.whitewhale.net
Deletions:
[[http://www.middlebury.edu/#story485577 |Middlebury College]]. < non-participation or contextual reconstruction - in the design rhetoric. http://www.whitewhale.net


Revision [18611]

Edited on 2014-09-20 05:44:45 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
[[http://www.middlebury.edu/#story485577 |Middlebury College]]. < non-participation or contextual reconstruction - in the design rhetoric. http://www.whitewhale.net


Revision [18586]

Edited on 2014-09-18 10:48:33 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
see TextAndContextInFourWebsitesProject
Deletions:
TextContextInFourWebsitesProject


Revision [18585]

Edited on 2014-09-18 10:47:56 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
The function of taking notes and revising notes.
== Describe Specific Circumstances== (kairos)
== Describe Similar Circumstances and Similar Messages ==
== Describe Rhetor and Audience ==
Not just the demographics but psychographic information.
[[http://web.mit.edu/ | MIT University web site home page]] < This might be leaning towards non-participation or contextual reconstruction. Evidence shows up when we consider specific circumstances, and similar circumstances and similar messages.
Deletions:
== Specific Circumstances== (kairos)
== Similar Circumstances and Similar Messages ==
== Rhetor and Audience ==
[[http://web.mit.edu/ | MIT University web site home page]] < might be leaning towards non-participation or contextual reconstruction.


Revision [18584]

Edited on 2014-09-18 10:33:31 by MorganAdmin

No Differences

Revision [18583]

Edited on 2014-09-18 10:32:55 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
== Planned Survey ==
This might seem unnecessary, but it has become so easy to do (Just Google It) that it's obligatory to find something out about the implied rhetor and / or the actual author, the broader context in which the artifact is operating, the historical and cultural context. It saves a lot of time and frustration to read up on the background rather than guessing.
[[http://web.mit.edu/ | MIT University web site home page]] < might be leaning towards non-participation or contextual reconstruction.
Deletions:
== Planned survey ==
[[http://web.mit.edu/ | MIT University web site home page]] < might be leaning towards non-participation or contextual reconstruction


Revision [18582]

Edited on 2014-09-18 10:26:53 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
BSU University web site home page < conformity
But have a look at [[http://www.lingscars.com/ | Ling's Cars]]. This page is not about being poorly designed - although it violates almost every convention in the web design books. It might seem like non-participation in car sales advertising on the web, but it leans pretty heavily towards desecration. A close look at the context and the text will help us think it through. [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vtib4WZW_4M | LINGsCARS: Dragons' Den episode with Ling]], and elsewhere.
Deletions:
BSU University web site home page
But have a look at [[http://www.lingscars.com/ | Ling's Cars]]. This page is not about being poorly designed - although it violates almost every convention in the web design books. It might seem like non-participation in car sales advertising on the web, but it leans pretty heavily towards desecration. A close look at the context and the text will help us think it through. [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vtib4WZW_4M | LINGsCARS: Full Dragons' Den episode with Ling]].


Revision [18581]

Edited on 2014-09-18 10:20:54 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
- use a clear visual hierarchy:
But have a look at [[http://www.lingscars.com/ | Ling's Cars]]. This page is not about being poorly designed - although it violates almost every convention in the web design books. It might seem like non-participation in car sales advertising on the web, but it leans pretty heavily towards desecration. A close look at the context and the text will help us think it through. [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vtib4WZW_4M | LINGsCARS: Full Dragons' Den episode with Ling]].
We can also see text-c0ntext interaction in a couple of music videos.
Deletions:
But have a look at [[http://www.lingscars.com/ | Ling's Cars]]. This page is not about being poorly designed. This seems like non-participation, but it might be desecration. A close look at the context and the text will help us think it through.
We can also see this happening in a couple of music videos.


Revision [18580]

Edited on 2014-09-18 10:11:15 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
- desecration: disrupts communication and cause confusion by purposely violating the rules of discourse, particularly the rules of interpretation of texts via contexts; desecration is irrational, mocking, and provides no serious alternative vision. 63. Archetype is punk when set in pop rock situation.
in draft
BSU University web site home page
[[http://web.mit.edu/ | MIT University web site home page]] < might be leaning towards non-participation or contextual reconstruction
[[http://www.deviantart.com/ | DeviantArt home page]] < conformity
[[http://www.globalwebfx.com/10-worst-websites-for-2013/ | Worst Websites for 2013]] < **might** be able to find interesting sites to work with here. Describe the context before you make the call. It's not just about being poorly designed.
==== Text-Context Relations in Other Digital Media ====
The text-context relationship let us re-consider some common rhetorical moves in digital spheres. Rebuses, shorthand, acronyms (FTW, WTF) and light or missing punctuation in IM and Twitter are typically seen as violations of print- and paper-based one-to many communication (although they often do occur in personal letters, one to one). When considered within the rhetorical context of Twitter, however, these affordances are conforming, while the non-use might appear as non-participation.
By the same idea, here's a list of moves that are often considered poor web design:
- use of white text against a black ground
- use of multiple fonts on one web page
- link text that doesn't designate the target
- blinking images
- moving images
- busy backgrounds
But have a look at [[http://www.lingscars.com/ | Ling's Cars]]. This page is not about being poorly designed. This seems like non-participation, but it might be desecration. A close look at the context and the text will help us think it through.
We can also see this happening in a couple of music videos.
Deletions:
- desecration: disrupts communication and cause confusion by purposely violating the rules of discourse, particularly the rules of interpretation of texts via contexts; desecration is irrational, mocking, and
provides no serious alternative vision. 63
The same text-context ideas let us reconsider - re-see - some common rhetorical moves in digital spheres:
- use of rebuses, shorthand, acronyms (FTW, WTF) and light punctuation in IM and Twitter
- use of white text against a black ground in web sites
- headings on web pages
- link text
- images in a web page or blog post
We can also see this happening with


Revision [18464]

Edited on 2014-09-14 07:20:41 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
Context ... helps us understand messages, but sometimes messages have an impact on how we understand the context. 60
The expectation that a message will (must?) fit a context in a particular way gives rise to prescription, and prescriptive viewing - something we're trying to avoid as rhetorical critics, especially when working in the digital realm, where conventions are still loose and under formation. Our task it to explain how a message works rather than declare that it doesn't.
- conformity. this is the point of reference for the other three, the regularity from which the others depart: conformity requires the adaptation of texts to the contexts in which they will operate. (61). fittingness, aptness
- non-participation: the message is purposely constructed to not "live up to expectations.” 61.
- desecration: disrupts communication and cause confusion by purposely violating the rules of discourse, particularly the rules of interpretation of texts via contexts; desecration is irrational, mocking, and
provides no serious alternative vision. 63
- contextual reconstruction: a text violates expectations but ultimately functions to redefine those expectations, making the violation acceptable to the audience - at the time 65
Deletions:
The expectation that a message will (must?) fit a context in a particular way gives rise to prescription, and prescriptive viewing - something we're trying to avoid as rhetorical critics, especially working in the digital realm, where conventions are still loose and under formation. Our task it to explain how a message works rather than declare it doesn't.
- conformity
- non-participation
- desecration
- contextual reconstruction


Revision [18462]

Edited on 2014-09-13 10:24:59 by MorganAdmin
Deletions:
From [[http://erhetoric.org/CWII/wikka.php?wakka=CourseStatement Morgan's A&E course statement]]: Usage note: l33t, txtng shorthand and rebuses (wnt 2, b4 u), IM and Facebook abbreviations and punctuation (LOL, all lower case, light or missing punctuation) are not appropriate in exercises or papers - unless they're used to make a point, in which case it's obvious what you're doing. and letting your word processor take care of punctuation isnt going to work in this class sure almost anyone can read english without commas and end stops and apostrophes they did for generations before punctuation and spelling were frozen in i think it was the mid 1600s but that still isnt going to fly in this course youll get a crap grade negative points and i may not even bother to read your stuff why should i this isnt facebook


Revision [18461]

Edited on 2014-09-13 10:23:19 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
- [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1_CLW-NNwc | A Million Ways]], OK Go. This might have been originally placed (year) as non-participation in context of music videos, but it now (2014) seems to be working in contextual reconstruction. Further study of the current rhetorical context might even place it as conforming to other music videos.
Deletions:
- [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTAAsCNK7RA | Here It Goes Again]], OK Go. This might have been originally placed (year) as non-participation in context of music videos, but it now (2014) seems to be working in contextual reconstruction. Further study of the current rhetorical context might even place it as conforming to other music videos.


Revision [18460]

Edited on 2014-09-13 10:21:58 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
- [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTAAsCNK7RA | Here It Goes Again]], OK Go. This might have been originally placed (year) as non-participation in context of music videos, but it now (2014) seems to be working in contextual reconstruction. Further study of the current rhetorical context might even place it as conforming to other music videos.
Deletions:
- OK Go on treadmills: As a video, this might have been originally placed (year) as non-participation in context of music videos, but it now (2014) seems to be working in contextual reconstruction. Further study of the current rhetorical context might even place it as conforming to other music videos.


Revision [18459]

Edited on 2014-09-13 10:20:38 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
- [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBmCJEehYtU | Cover of Royals]] by Puddles Pity Party, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlcIKh6sBtc originally by Lorde]]. I haven't looked closely enough at the specifics of the text and the specifics of the context to place this yet. The relation we're looking at is that between this text and the context it addressed at the time, not conformity or non-conformity to genre.
Deletions:
- Puddle's cover of Royals, originally by Lourds. I haven't looked closely enough at the specifics of the text and the specifics of the context to place this yet. The relation we're looking at is that between this text and the context it addressed at the time, not conformity or non-conformity to genre.


Revision [18457]

Edited on 2014-09-13 10:17:04 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
- Puddle's cover of Royals, originally by Lourds. I haven't looked closely enough at the specifics of the text and the specifics of the context to place this yet. The relation we're looking at is that between this text and the context it addressed at the time, not conformity or non-conformity to genre.
- OK Go on treadmills: As a video, this might have been originally placed (year) as non-participation in context of music videos, but it now (2014) seems to be working in contextual reconstruction. Further study of the current rhetorical context might even place it as conforming to other music videos.
Deletions:
- Puddle's cover of Royals, originally by Lourds. I haven't looked closely enough at the text and context to place this yet. Keep in mind that the relation we're looking at is text and context, not conformity or non-conformity to genre.
- OK Go on treadmills: As a video, this might have been originally seen (year) can be seen as non-participation in context of music videos, but it now (2014) seems to be working in contextual reconstruction. Some further study of the current rhetorical context might even place it as conforming to the current context.


Revision [18454]

Edited on 2014-09-13 10:04:30 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
- Puddle's cover of Royals, originally by Lourds. I haven't looked closely enough at the text and context to place this yet. Keep in mind that the relation we're looking at is text and context, not conformity or non-conformity to genre.
- OK Go on treadmills: As a video, this might have been originally seen (year) can be seen as non-participation in context of music videos, but it now (2014) seems to be working in contextual reconstruction. Some further study of the current rhetorical context might even place it as conforming to the current context.
Deletions:
- Puddle's cover of Royals, originally by Lourds. Not sure. I'd have to look at this more closely.
- OK Go on treadmills: As a video, this can be seen as non-participation or contextual reconstruction.


Revision [18451]

Edited on 2014-09-13 09:36:09 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
TextContextInFourWebsitesProject
Deletions:
TextContextInFourWebsitesExercise


Revision [18450]

Edited on 2014-09-13 09:35:36 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
... inherent in precise description is a kind of analysis. As we explained in Chapter 3, description and analysis are related and you will often find that some preliminary analysis happens as you work on description. That's good, and you should be prepared to note ideas and message characteristics that merit further investigation when you intentionally begin the analysis of the message. However, it is important that you don’t lose control when describing the message and give in to the temptation to skip the important step of description. You can control your thinking and facilitate your success by creating a plan for description. (S&P, 67, n 1)
==== Relation between text and context ====
S&P, drawing from Branham and Pierce, discuss four ways text and context can interact:
- conformity
- non-participation
- desecration
- contextual reconstruction
S&P suggest that "these ideas useful as analytical tools."
Try using the preceding ideas informally and see how they work in everyday conversation. For example, think of yourself as a manager in an office or factory where you ask one of your subordinates why he missed the last three days of work. That person’s behavior exists in some context, and, in order to make sense of the story you are given, you may ask: ls this story an effort to conform to or affirm the context? (”I understand that my absences cause problems for everyone on the project. I’m sorry about the trouble and will try not to miss anymore") ls the story an effort to "not participate” in or avoid attending to the situation? (“I didn't realize missing was a problem. Say, did you see the Oscars the other night ... ?”) Is the story designed to desecrate the context? (“Where I am and where I go is my business. You have no right bugging me about where I've been-you don’t own mel”) Is the subordinate’s response an attempt to re- create the situation? (”I know missing is not good for the group. However, I had a larger concern on my mind because I was counseling my little brother to get him away from a cult. His life was literally at stake and I had tolconsider the relative importance of the demands upon me =- I chose to save my brother’s life.") The seemingly innocuous context of missing a few days of work is not an uncommon ”exigence” or situation needing an explanation. (66)
==== Some examples ====
The same text-context ideas let us reconsider - re-see - some common rhetorical moves in digital spheres:
- centered text on web pages
- headings on web pages
- link text
- images in a web page or blog post
We can also see this happening with
- Puddle's cover of Royals, originally by Lourds. Not sure. I'd have to look at this more closely.
- OK Go on treadmills: As a video, this can be seen as non-participation or contextual reconstruction.
TextContextInFourWebsitesExercise
Deletions:
==== Exercise in relation between text and context ====
=== Examples that spur gut reactions that we need to work with ===
- use of apostrophes in signs: potato's is common, but so are CD's and ID's. But there is no apostrophe in Don't Walk signs and and we might demand Regent's Park but we'll get Regents Park.
- use of fewer or less in a 10 items or _____ grocery store line
- [your peeve here]


Revision [18449]

Edited on 2014-09-13 08:56:07 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
- use of apostrophes in signs: potato's is common, but so are CD's and ID's. But there is no apostrophe in Don't Walk signs and and we might demand Regent's Park but we'll get Regents Park.
Deletions:
- use of apostrophes in signs: potato's is common, but so are CD's and ID's. But there is no apostrophe in Don't Walk signs and and we might demand Regent's Park but we'll get Regents Park.


Revision [18448]

Edited on 2014-09-13 08:55:49 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
=== Examples that spur gut reactions that we need to work with ===
- use of apostrophes in signs: potato's is common, but so are CD's and ID's. But there is no apostrophe in Don't Walk signs and and we might demand Regent's Park but we'll get Regents Park.
- use of fewer or less in a 10 items or _____ grocery store line
- use of rebuses, shorthand, acronyms (FTW, WTF) and light punctuation in IM and Twitter
- use of white text against a black ground in web sites
- [your peeve here]
----
----
From [[http://erhetoric.org/CWII/wikka.php?wakka=CourseStatement Morgan's A&E course statement]]: Usage note: l33t, txtng shorthand and rebuses (wnt 2, b4 u), IM and Facebook abbreviations and punctuation (LOL, all lower case, light or missing punctuation) are not appropriate in exercises or papers - unless they're used to make a point, in which case it's obvious what you're doing. and letting your word processor take care of punctuation isnt going to work in this class sure almost anyone can read english without commas and end stops and apostrophes they did for generations before punctuation and spelling were frozen in i think it was the mid 1600s but that still isnt going to fly in this course youll get a crap grade negative points and i may not even bother to read your stuff why should i this isnt facebook
----
CategoryNotes CategoryExercise
Deletions:
Example:
Usage note: l33t, txtng shorthand and rebuses (wnt 2, b4 u), IM and Facebook abbreviations and punctuation (LOL, all lower case, light or missing punctuation) are not appropriate in exercises or papers - unless they're used to make a point, in which case it's obvious what you're doing. and letting your word processor take care of punctuation isnt going to work in this class sure almost anyone can read english without commas and end stops and apostrophes they did for generations before punctuation and spelling were frozen in i think it was the mid 1600s but that still isnt going to fly in this course youll get a crap grade negative points and i may not even bother to read your stuff why should i this isnt facebook


Revision [18447]

Edited on 2014-09-13 08:47:20 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
Usage note: l33t, txtng shorthand and rebuses (wnt 2, b4 u), IM and Facebook abbreviations and punctuation (LOL, all lower case, light or missing punctuation) are not appropriate in exercises or papers - unless they're used to make a point, in which case it's obvious what you're doing. and letting your word processor take care of punctuation isnt going to work in this class sure almost anyone can read english without commas and end stops and apostrophes they did for generations before punctuation and spelling were frozen in i think it was the mid 1600s but that still isnt going to fly in this course youll get a crap grade negative points and i may not even bother to read your stuff why should i this isnt facebook


Revision [18446]

Edited on 2014-09-13 08:45:43 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
The contextual components of circumtances, similar messages, rhetor, and audience give rise to //expectations// among audiences or members about the way communication //should// occur. For example, if you know that the president is about to address the nation on television, you implicitly have expectations about the way he will speak, what he will wear, what subject(s) he will address, and so forth. And if you are surfing the Web and find a site for Grateful Dead fans, you implicitly have expectations about the layout of the site, its contents, and its style. The medium and the message maker in these two cases differ significantly and shape our expectations of rhetorical events. ln essence, texts and contexts interact ... and we need to understand what some of those possible relationships may be in order to describe them. (S&P 60)
The expectation that a message will (must?) fit a context in a particular way gives rise to prescription, and prescriptive viewing - something we're trying to avoid as rhetorical critics, especially working in the digital realm, where conventions are still loose and under formation. Our task it to explain how a message works rather than declare it doesn't.
Example:
Deletions:
The contextual components of circumtances, similar messages, rhetor, and audience give rise to //expectations// among audiences or members about the way communication //should// occur. For example, if you know that the president is about to address the nation on television, you implicitly have expectations about the way he will speak, what he will wear, what subject(s) he will address, and so forth. And if you are surfing the Web and find a site for Grateful Dead fans, you implicitly have expectations about the layout of the site, its contents, and its style. The medium and the message maker in these two cases differ significantly and shape our expectations of rhetorical events. ln essence, texts and contexts interact ... and we need to understand what some of those possible relationships may be in order to describe them. (S&P 60)''


Revision [18445]

Edited on 2014-09-13 08:40:22 by MorganAdmin
Additions:


Revision [18444]

Edited on 2014-09-13 08:40:12 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
==== Method ====
=== Two ways of making observation systematic ===
== Planned survey ==
== Questions ==
== Specific Circumstances== (kairos)
== Similar Circumstances and Similar Messages ==
== Rhetor and Audience ==
Facing the expected from a descriptive stance.
The contextual components of circumtances, similar messages, rhetor, and audience give rise to //expectations// among audiences or members about the way communication //should// occur. For example, if you know that the president is about to address the nation on television, you implicitly have expectations about the way he will speak, what he will wear, what subject(s) he will address, and so forth. And if you are surfing the Web and find a site for Grateful Dead fans, you implicitly have expectations about the layout of the site, its contents, and its style. The medium and the message maker in these two cases differ significantly and shape our expectations of rhetorical events. ln essence, texts and contexts interact ... and we need to understand what some of those possible relationships may be in order to describe them. (S&P 60)''
Deletions:
=== Options: Two Methods ===
Planned survey
Questions
Specific Circumstances (kairos)
Similar Circumstances and Similar Messages
Rhetor and Audience


Revision [18443]

Edited on 2014-09-13 08:34:16 by MorganAdmin
Additions:
===== Morgan's Notes On Messages Chap 4: Text and Context =====
Deletions:
===== Morgan's Notes On Messages Chap 4 =====


Revision [18442]

The oldest known version of this page was created on 2014-09-13 08:29:12 by MorganAdmin
Valid XHTML :: Valid CSS: :: Powered by WikkaWiki